Re: RFC: Attaching threads to cgroups is OK?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:12:47 +0900 (JST)
Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  - I think this kind of thread application should control its I/O requests
>    inside of the application. I guess it seems to quite difficult to
>    determine which thread is doing what kind of job in the application.
>    We can just leave this issue to these type of applications, can we?
>    I guess most of this kind of applications must have been well designed
>    already.
> 
I agree. (it's better to postpone this.)

But maybe cpuset (HPC) applications uses per-thread cgroup attachment.
So, I can't say there is no trouble even if we ignore threads.

Thanks,
-Kame

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux