Re: [PATCH 0/2] Paravirt loops per jiffy calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Glauber Costa wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Over the last weeks, there has been some discussion regarding paravirt
> lpj calculation for kvm. Here's my shot at that.
>
> KVM hypervisor already put the right value in our pvclock structures,
> as part of the xen compatibility efforts.
>
> So the first patch moves the respective xen code to pvclock.c (since
> we'll be doing the same calculation anyway), while the second, implements
> functions for kvm that makes use of it.
>
> Turns out that only implementing a pv get_tsc_khz is not enough, since
> it will only do the right thing for cpu0, which is not what we desire.
>
> So we set preset_lpj. Recall this code is run before arch parameter setup,
> so if we pass lpj=xx in the command line, it'll still work.
>
> Have a good (paravirtual) time!
>
>   

I only have this email out of the patchset.  Please resend.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux