Isaku Yamahata wrote: > I had explained about that. > I had considered that option. However my conclusion is not share > he implementation because xen/ia64 timer interrupt isn't > paravirtualized with VCPUOP_xxx hypercall. But xen/ia64 emulates > ar.itm register. (ar.itm is interval time match register which triggers > interrupt when interval time counter becomes same value) > > Since timer interruption is virtualized differently on xen/ia64, > the different implementation is a natural consequence. OK, that means the clockevent and clocksource part would be different. But the runstate accounting should still be the same, no? J _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization