Re: [PATCH 24/29] ia64/pv_ops/xen: implement xen pv_time_ops.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> I had explained about that.
> I had considered that option. However my conclusion is not share 
> he implementation because xen/ia64 timer interrupt isn't
> paravirtualized with VCPUOP_xxx hypercall. But xen/ia64 emulates
> ar.itm register. (ar.itm is interval time match register which triggers
> interrupt when interval time counter becomes same value)
>
> Since timer interruption is virtualized differently on xen/ia64,
> the different implementation is a natural consequence.

OK, that means the clockevent and clocksource part would be different.  
But the runstate accounting should still be the same, no?

    J

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux