On Monday 14 July 2008 21:51:25 Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Montag, 14. Juli 2008 schrieb Hidetoshi Seto:
> > + /* Wait all others come to life */
> > + while (cpus_weight(prepared_cpus) != num_online_cpus() - 1) {
> > + if (time_is_before_jiffies(limit))
> > + goto timeout;
> > + cpu_relax();
> > + }
> > +
>
> Hmm. I think this could become interesting on virtual machines. The
> hypervisor might be to busy to schedule a specific cpu at certain load
> scenarios. This would cause a failure even if the cpu is not really locked
> up. We had similar problems with the soft lockup daemon on s390.
5 seconds is a fairly long time. If all else fails we could have a config
option to simply disable this code.
> It would be good to not-use wall-clock time, but really used cpu time
> instead. Unfortunately I have no idea, if that is possible in a generic
> way. Heiko, any ideas?
Ah, cpu time comes up again. Perhaps we should actually dig that up again;
Zach and Jeremy CC'd.
Thanks,
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
