Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:28:15 -0700
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@xxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Friebel <thomas.friebel@xxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200807081451.43433.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)

Nick Piggin wrote:
> What's lguest's solution?
>   

Uniprocessor only.

    J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

References:
- [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks
  - From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks
  - From: Rusty Russell
- Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks
  - From: Nick Piggin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks
Next by Date: [PATCH] virtio_net: Set VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM feature
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM Development] [Libvirt Development] [Libvirt Users] [CentOS Virtualization] [Netdev] [Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux