Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-06-18 at 17:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>   
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>     
>>> Along the lines of:
>>>       
>> Hell no. There's a reason we have a special set_wrprotect() thing. We can 
>> do it more efficiently on native hardware by just clearing the bit 
>> atomically. No need to do the cmpxchg games.
>>     
>
> But we can't batch ... 
>   

Which architecture are you interested in?  If it isn't x86, you can 
probably get anything past Linus ;)

I'll do some measurements to see what effect the batchable 
ptep_set_wrprotect() has on native.  If it's significant, I'll propose 
making it conditional on CONFIG_PARAVIRT.

    J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux