Re: [PATCH 1 of 4] mm: add a ptep_modify_prot transaction abstraction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >
> > ptep_modify_prot_start() returns the current pte value, and puts the
> >   pte entry into a state where either the hardware will not update the
> >   pte, or if it does, the updates will be preserved on commit.
> > 
> > ptep_modify_prot_commit() writes back the updated pte, makes sure that
> >   any hardware updates made since ptep_modify_prot_start() are
> >   preserved.
> 
> Ok, I'm fine with this now that it's renamed to be clearly about just 
> protection bits.
> 
> So 
> 
> 	Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

And seems very reasonable (and exceptionally well described) to me too.

	Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux