Avi Kivity wrote: >>> This all looks pretty good. How do you want this to get into the >>> kernel? >>> >> >> [ note: fixed up kvm list address: s/-owner// ] >> >> Good question. The kvm patches have dependencies on not-yet merged >> bits, so they have to go through the kvm queue. The first two can also >> go through Ingos x86 tree I guess. >> >> > > Alternativey, if Ingo acks, I'll send all five through kvm.git. > > Note the kvm specific patches need to be backported as we want them > for 2.6.26. I can do that. > > (Ingo: said patches are in > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/18149) > What's happening with this? Is it going through x86.git or what? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
