Re: [PATCH] x86 DMA: Handle devices assigned to the guest by the host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> index 388b113..678cafb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
> @@ -443,6 +443,17 @@ dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
>  		memset(memory, 0, size);
>  		if (!mmu) {
>  			*dma_handle = bus;
> +			if (unlikely(dma_ops->is_pv_device) &&
> +			    unlikely(dma_ops->is_pv_device(dev, dev->bus_id))) {

First double unlikely in a condition is useless. Just drop them.

And then ->is_xyz() in a generic vops interface is about as ugly
and non generic as you can get. dma_alloc_coherent is not performance
critical, so you should rather change the interface that ->alloc_coherent
is always called and the other handlers handle the !mmu case correctly.
In fact they need that already I guess (e.g. on DMAR there is not really
a nommu case) 

-Andi

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux