Re: [PATCH 04/15] ia64/pv_ops: introduce pv_info which describes some random info.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dong, Eddie wrote:
> My understanding is that code such as IVT table are well tuned and you
> are really 
> difficult to pursuade people to replace those privilege resource access
> instruction
> to use vdso or something equalvalent such as mov GRx=CRy.  For those C
> code
> previlige resource access, like Isaku mentioned, we need to consider
> native too.

Hi Eddie,

I think binary patching of the ivt makes a lot of sense, I am certainly
not opposed to that. I was more thinking in terms of calls out of the
regular C code.

Cheers,
Jes
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux