From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:50:27 +1000
> But I was curious as to why the +2 in the MAX_SKB_FRAGS definition?
To be honest I have no idea.
When Alexey added the TSO changeset way back then, it had the
"+2", from the history-2.6 tree:
commit 80223d5186f73bf42a7e260c66c9cb9f7d8ec9cf
Author: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Aug 28 11:52:03 2002 -0700
[NET]: Add TCP segmentation offload core infrastructure.
...
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index a812681..9b6e6ad 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ struct sk_buff_head {
struct sk_buff;
-#define MAX_SKB_FRAGS 6
+/* To allow 64K frame to be packed as single skb without frag_list */
+#define MAX_SKB_FRAGS (65536/PAGE_SIZE + 2)
typedef struct skb_frag_struct skb_frag_t;
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
