> So I think it would be good to plonk the proposed interface on the table > and have a poke at it. Is it compat-safe? Is it extensible in a > backward-compatible fashion? Are there future-safe changes we should make > to it? Can Michael Kerrisk understand, review and document it? etc. > > You know what I'm saying ;) What is the proposed interface? So, I'm not Michael, but I *did* make an attempt to document this interface - user and kernel sides - so that it could be more easily understood: http://lwn.net/Articles/276856/ That was the previous posting, but a quick look suggests it hasn't changed *that* much in this round. jon _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
