On Wednesday 09 April 2008 05:49:15 Max Krasnyansky wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > This patch modifies tun to allow a vringfd to specify the receive > > buffer. Because we can't copy to userspace in bh context, we queue > > like normal then use the "pull" hook to actually do the copy. > > > > More thought needs to be put into the possible races with ring > > registration and a simultaneous close, for example (see FIXME). > > > > We use struct virtio_net_hdr prepended to packets in the ring to allow > > userspace to receive GSO packets in future (at the moment, the tun > > driver doesn't tell the stack it can handle them, so these cases are > > never taken). > > In general the code looks good. The only thing I could not convince myself > in is whether having generic ring buffer makes sense or not. > At least the TUN driver would be more efficient if it had its own simple > ring implementation. Less indirection, fewer callbacks, fewer if()s, etc. > TUN already has the file descriptor and having two additional fds for rx > and tx ring is a waste (think of a VPN server that has to have a bunch of > TUN fds). Also as I mentioned before Jamal and I wanted to expose some of > the SKB fields through TUN device. With the rx/tx rings the natural way of > doing that would be the ring descriptor itself. It can of course be done > the same way we copy proto info (PI) and GSO stuff before the packet but > that means more copy_to_user() calls and yet more checks. > > So. What am I missing ? Why do we need generic ring for the TUN ? I looked > at the lguest code a bit and it seems that we need a bunch of network > specific code anyway. The cool thing is that you can now mmap the rings > into the guest directly but the same thing can be done with TUN specific > rings. I started modifying tun to do this directly, but it ended up with a whole heap of code just for the rings, and a lot of current code (eg. read, write, poll) ended up inside an 'if (tun->rings) ... else {'. Having a natural poll() interface for the rings made more sense, so being their own fds fell out naturally. I decided to float this version because it does minimal damage to tun, and I know that other people have wanted rings before: I'd like to know if this is likely to be generic enough for them. Thanks! Rusty _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization