* Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Would anyone have objection to have PARAVIRT depend on PCI, since the > vsmp paravirt bits depend on PCI cfg space to determine if the system > is vsmp? If not, this patch would suffice. hm, that's not a good idea - there's nothing in lguest, Xen and even KVM that is inherently tied to PCI. Ingo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
