Isaku Yamahata (on Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:16:42 +0900) wrote: >Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from >the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. >This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly >code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. >We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie >already said before. > >Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested several ways. > 1: Dual IVT source code, dual IVT table. (The way this patch set adopted) > 2: Same IVT source code, but dual/mulitple compile to generate > dual/multiple IVT table using assembler macro. > 3: Single IVT table, using indirect function call for pv_ops using > branch/binary patching. > >At this moment my preference is the option 2. Please comment. A combination of options (2) and (3) would work. Have a single source file for the IVT, using conditional macros. Use that source file to build (at least) two copies of the IVT, for native and any virtualized modes. The native copy of the IVT starts at label ia64_ivt in section .text.ivt, as it does now. Any IVT versions for virtualized mode are defined as __cpuinitdata, so they are discarded after boot, unless CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=y. arch/ia64/kernel/head.S copies the relevant virtualized version over ia64_ivt when necessary, before initializing cr.iva. Single source for maintenance. No indirect function overhead at run time. Binary patching at boot time for the right mode. No wasted space in the kernel. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
