On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:55:41AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Eduardo Pereira Habkost wrote: > >If this is desirable for broader testing, we can make config PARAVIRT > >visible and selectable on menuconfig, even when there is no guest > >implementation being enabled. Should I do it? > > > > Yes please. > This will allow people to enable the paravirt_ops code even when no guest support is enabled, for broader testing of the paravirt_ops code. Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 4e910d8..715bbcd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -325,15 +325,6 @@ config SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER If in doubt, say "Y". -config PARAVIRT - bool - depends on X86_32 && !(X86_VISWS || X86_VOYAGER) - help - This changes the kernel so it can modify itself when it is run - under a hypervisor, potentially improving performance significantly - over full virtualization. However, when run without a hypervisor - the kernel is theoretically slower and slightly larger. - menuconfig PARAVIRT_GUEST bool "Paravirtualized guest support" depends on X86_32 @@ -359,6 +350,15 @@ config VMI source "arch/x86/lguest/Kconfig" +config PARAVIRT + bool "Enable paravirtualization code" + depends on X86_32 && !(X86_VISWS || X86_VOYAGER) + help + This changes the kernel so it can modify itself when it is run + under a hypervisor, potentially improving performance significantly + over full virtualization. However, when run without a hypervisor + the kernel is theoretically slower and slightly larger. + endif config ACPI_SRAT -- 1.5.3.4 -- Eduardo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
