Re: [PATCH] KVM simplified virtio balloon driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 07:56 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Dor Laor wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 11:25 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> >   
> >>> Another idea: Martin added an oom notifier to the cmm driver. Before the 
> >>> oom-killer kicks in cmm will try to free 256 pages. I think your virtio 
> >>> balloon driver should do the same - it seems to be the correct tradeoff. 
> >>>       
> >> Nod, you definitly want to add an oom notifier. If 256 pages is the
> >> correct number of pages to free is debatable. We have seen long delays
> >> for a process that quickly eats up memory if there are lots of pages in
> >> the balloon. The problem is that the memory management tries hard to
> >> find memory until it decides to oom kill a process, only to be stopped
> >> in the last second by the oom notifier. The 1MB is quickly eaten up
> >> again so the whole things starts again. The profile of such a scenario
> >> shows that almost all cpu is burned in the page reclaim code.
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > Seconded, in that case we can add a config space notification from the
> > guest to the host that will be triggered by the oom.
> > The host will get this notification and will decide whether to allow the
> > guest to deflate the balloon or to keep the current balloon size because
> > the whole host is over committed.
> >   
> 
> The host doesn't decide whether to allow the guest to deflate.  Virtual 
> memory size and resident memory side are independent in KVM.  The host 
> decides what the RSS is but the guest is free to determine it's VSS.  
> The host provides hints to the guest about it's RSS size (via 
> ballooning) so the guest can optimize it's VSS size.  If guest chooses 
> to make it's VSS size to large, it will only hurt itself (by being 
> forced to swap by the host).

ok, this is true when the new memory controller targeted for the next
kernel.In that case I more then agree.
Nevertheless, the guest should pass the host data about it's current
memory usage (working set size, oom triggering, etc) so the host would 
change the rss limit dynamically.
Thanks,
Dor

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux