Re: [kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 7/7] userspace virtio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony Liguori wrote:
I think we should hold off on this sort of patch at first. I know it improves performance, but it's very hack-ish. I have a similar patch[1] that improves performance more but is even more hack-ish.

I think we have to approach this by not special cases virtio-net to know about the tap fd, but to figure out the interface that virtio-net would need to be efficient, and then refactor the net interface to look like that. Then we can still support user, pcap, and the other network transports.

[1] http://hg.codemonkey.ws/qemu-virtio/file/75cefe566cea/aio-net.diff

While you are right in principle, high performance networking is long overdue in kvm so I applied that patch. Once a mega async dma framework is added to qemu, we'll just revert that patch prior to adding the glue to said framework.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux