On Dec 19, 2007 8:17 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly > > integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are moved > > to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are deleted. Note > > that there's much less headers included in the final version. > > hm, doesnt apply; > > Applying patch patches/x86-finish-processor-h-integration.patch > patching file include/asm-x86/processor.h > Hunk #2 FAILED at 287. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 311. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 786 (offset -8 lines). > 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file include/asm-x86/processor.h > > i fixed it up by hand - the result is below - does it look OK to you? > (Also, could you check latest x86.git whether i've picked up all your > patches correctly - the reject might be indicative of some missing > pieces.) Your fix is okay. The other patches seems to be all there. The reason for this is that it conflicts with Roland's (welcome) i387 patches. -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
