On Dec 18, 2007 3:18 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 18 December 2007 09:52:36 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > > This patch changes the bitwise operations in bitops.h to get > > a void pointers as a parameter. Before this patch, a lot of warnings > > can be seen. They're gone after it. > > No, this is a backwards step! These warnings are important for > non-arch-specific code: I fought hard to get them made into unsigned longs. > > But I'm happy for this to be applied as is, then I'll grab the git tree, > revert it and fix the warnings... > Even before my processor.h patches, there are a lot of warnings caused by this. If Ingo does not mind getting more warnings, I can drop this patch entirely, and you (or someone else) can fix them later on. -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
