Re: [PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
Well, "no functional changes" is not quite the same thing as "no object code changes".

yeah, true, but the safest way to ensure no functional changes is to get identical object code. In sched-devel.git i include obj comparisons to cleanup patches as a self-assurance (and later bughunt helper) to make sure a cleanup is really just a cleanup.

Of course. "No object code changes" is a stronger statement, however, not all types of cleanups result in that.

Which is the case here. I wasn't expecting the same object code. Anyway, the mistake is explained, and I'm about to send the correct version. Sorry again.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux