Re: paravirt_alloc_pd_clone() useful?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 11:24 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Do you use paravirt_alloc_pd_clone()?  I seem to you remember you
> mentioning that it doesn't help you very much.  I'm in the process of
> unifying pgalloc*, and it seems to me that it would be a bit cleaner
> without needing to worry about paravirt_alloc_pd_clone()...

Yes, we do, and it is one of our largest performance gains.  It is
clone_pgd_range() that turned out not to be useful.

Zach

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux