On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:40:50AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > These don't apply now due to the x86 merge. Care to backport them and > > send them to the stable@xxxxxxxxxx address so we can apply them > > properly? > > I'm a bit confused. The patches you mailed out are against arch/i386. > Won't they apply to the stable tree as-is? Was this second series a new set, or a different one? I was assuming they were new patches, and that they too needed to be applied. These patches were sent against the merged x86 tree, not the -stable tree with i386. > > Although, it's not like anyone actually uses the in-kernel Xen on > > 2.6.23, so it's probably not really worth it. > > > > To be fair, those fixes were in response to bug reports raised on the > released 2.6.23 kernel. But it isn't screamingly urgent. Ok, that's fine, but can you send some patches that I can apply? :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
