Re: [Lguest] [PATCH] virtio config_ops refactoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dor Laor wrote:
ron minnich wrote:

Hi, I'm sorry, I've been stuck on other things (NFS RDMA anyone?) and
missed part of this discussion.

Is it really the case that operations on virtio devices will involve
outl/inl etc.?

What's the problem with them?
Except for the kick event it's not performance critical and the difference between pio vmexit
and hypercall exit is very small.

If you're a nutty guy who's interesting in creating the most absolute minimal VMM to run exotic paravirtual guests on massive clusters, then requiring PIO implies that you have to have an instruction decoder which is goes against the earlier goal ;-)

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

I don't know about problems in other architectures, maybe mmio is better?
Dor.


Apologies in advance for my failure to pay attention.

thanks

ron
_______________________________________________
Lguest mailing list
Lguest@xxxxxxxxxx
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/lguest



_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux