On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 12:48 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 20. September 2007 schrieb Rusty Russell:
> > The network driver uses *two* virtqueues: one for input packets and
> > one for output packets. This has nice locking properties (ie. we
> > don't do any for recv vs send).
> [...]
> > 3) Resolve freeing of old xmit skbs (someone sent patch IIRC?)
>
> Yes, that was me. I am quite busy at the moment but I will send a refreshed
> patch soon. The most annoying fact of my current patch is, that I have to add
> locking. (Because of the only one operation per virtqueue at a time rule)
Sorry Christian, I thought it was you but was in a hurry to send out the
patches so didn't go back and check.
Can't we just re-use the default xmit lock?
> [...]
> > +struct virtnet_info
> > +{
> > + struct virtqueue_ops *vq_ops;
> > + struct virtqueue *vq_recv;
> > + struct virtqueue *vq_send;
> > + struct net_device *ndev;
>
> This is only a matter of taste, but I like netdev or dev more than ndev.
Yeah, I agreed. It was a moment of weakness: I've renamed it to "dev".
Thanks!
Rusty.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
