On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 07:56 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > Well, containerization deserves its own menu, but the question is does i > > it belong under this menu? > > No, I don't think so. While there are some broad similarities in > effect, the technology is completely different, as are the capabilities > and tradeoffs. They're pretty much orthogonal. It seems to me containerization is much more similar a feature to SYSV IPC, process accounting / auditing, and should be an option under General setup, possibly with its own submenu. Nearly all the features under general setup provide optional extensions to kernel services available from userspace, and so it seems containerization falls naturally into that category. Virtualization is completely different, and probably needs separate server (kvm, lguest) and client (kvm, lguest, xen, vmware) sections in it's menu. Zach _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
