On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:20 -0300, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > The assumption that we have an overall irqs_pending flags, > and a one-to-one lguest <-> task mapping fails to hold on x86_64, > where we can have multiple puppies, aka vcpus. > > Although ifdefs could be used, it makes the code much more > unreadable, and other ports are on the way, anyway. So some sort > of acessor is preferred anyway. I'd prefer to see the i386 code use vcpus too. Even if i386 only has one at present, it's cleaner. Of course, there'll be a lot of "s/lg/vcpu/" churn, but that's OK. Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
