On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 04:31 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 10:16 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > @@ -569,6 +570,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void) > > } > > sort_main_extable(); > > trap_init(); > > + kvm_guest_init(); > > rcu_init(); > > init_IRQ(); > > pidhash_init(); > > Hi Anthony, > > This placement seems arbitrary. Why not earlier from setup_arch, or as > a normal initcall? The placement is important if we wish to have a paravirt_ops hook for the interrupt controller. This is the latest possible spot we can do it. A comment is probably appropriate here. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Rusty. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > kvm-devel mailing list > kvm-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization