Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I still think it's preferable to change some drivers than everybody.
> 
> AFAIK BusLogic as real hardware is pretty much dead anyways,
> so you're probably the only primary user of it anyways.
> Go wild on it!

I don't believe anyone is materially maintaining the buslogic driver and
in time its going to break completely.

> Well that might be. I just think it would be a mistake
> to design paravirt_ops based on someone's short term release engineering
> considerations.

Agreed, especially as an interface where each in or out traps into the
hypervisor is broken even for the model of virtualising hardware. 

> I thought we had that already?  But can't find it now :/

pci_iomap() and friends. 

Alan
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux