Re: [PATCH] Add I/O hypercalls for i386 paravirt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andi Kleen wrote:
Ah. But that's mostly modules, so real in-core changes should be very

Yes that's the big difference. Near all paravirt ops are concentrated
on the core kernel, but this one affects lots of people.

And why "but"? -- modules are as important as the core kernel. They're
not second citizens.

It's not being second class; simply few modules are loaded at runtime, so most of the code impact is on disk. The in-code impact is small. If paravirt i/o insns are worthwhile, I don't think code size is an issue.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux