On 8/21/07, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Montag, 20. August 2007 schrieb Glauber de Oliveira Costa: > > Although I don't know KVM to a that deep level, I think it should be > > possible to keep the virtual cpus in different process (or threads), > > and take the accounting time from there. Perfectly possible to know > > the time we spent running (user time), and the time the hypervisor > > spent doing things on our behalf (system time). > > I disagree here. First thing, you dont want to have the virtual cpu in a > different process than the hypervisor control code for that cpu. Otherwise > communication has to be made via IPC. > Secondly, Its not qemu/kvm that does the accouting. Its existing userspace > code like top/snmp agents and clients! etc. that would require additional > knowledge which thread is guest code. Yes, the second argument kills me, and I think it leaves no further room from discussion in my side. Thanks for the enlightenment. > I personally like the approach Laurent has taken. Maybe it needs some polish > and maybe we want an account_guest_time function, but in general I think he > is doing the right thing. > Now, me too. -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
