Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 00/10] PV-IO v3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 17:12 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Dor Laor wrote:
> > Using Rusty's code there is no waste.
> > Each descriptor has a flag (head|next). Next flag stands for pointer to
> > the
> > next descriptor with u32 next index. So the waste is 4 bytes.
> > Sg descriptors are chained on the same descriptor ring.
> >   
> 
> Block I/O can easily require 256 sglist entries, eating up your ring.

Absolutely; I think we'd want this variable sized, rather than a single
page as the current implementation does for no really sound reason.

That said, I don't have a problem with Avi's out-of-band mechanism.  A
"DMA" hypercall can follow that almost as easily, and it does give that
nice "fixed number of slots" effect.

Cheers,
Rusty.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux