Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Introduce a new fields "gtime" and "cgtime" in task_struct and signal_struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Montag, 20. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
>> Index: kvm/fs/proc/array.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- kvm.orig/fs/proc/array.c    2007-08-20 11:11:30.000000000 +0200
>> +++ kvm/fs/proc/array.c 2007-08-20 13:04:03.000000000 +0200
> 
> Just a heads up, this patch collides with this fix in mm:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=118737949222362&w=2
> 
> If Ingo accepts this fix, your patch should be adopted in array.c to use 
> cputime_t for gtime as well. Lets see what Ingo thinks.

Thank you for the comment. No problem for me to rewrite the patch according the
fix in the mm.

Laurent
-- 
------------- Laurent.Vivier@xxxxxxxx  --------------
          "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux