Re: [PATCH 3/25][V3] irq_flags / halt routines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Didn't we agree this should be a pvops client?
>
> -Andi
>
No. I exposed my reasoning, asked you back, but got no answer.
I'll do it again:

This operations are just manipulating bits, and are doing no
privileged operations at all. Nothing that can be paravirtualized, in
the proper sense. Altough we do can introduce such operations for
clarity of code, I personally believe it is not the way to go.

What I did, then, was move this outside  the PARAVIRT ifdef, which
lead to a much cleaner code.



-- 
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net

"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux