* Randy Dunlap (randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:55:36 -0700 Chris Wright wrote: > > * joe@xxxxxxxxxxx (joe@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > +F: arch/i386/xen/ > > > +F: drivers/*/xen-*front.c > > > +F: drivers/xen/ > > > +F: include/asm-i386/xen/ > > > +F: include/xen/ > > > > I think this data will easily become stale. What is the point again? > > Agreed. But not everyone wants to or should have to use git, > so what are the alternatives? Between git (or gitweb), existing MAINTAINERS and a bit of common sense (or extra sleuthing), I never perceived a significant problem. Alternative could be to place info directly in source files. If not all of MAINTAINERS info, it could be a tag to reference the relevant MAINTAINERS entry. thanks, -chris _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
