On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 20:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been working on lguest64 and in order to do this, I had to move > a lot of the i386 specific out of the way. Well, the lguest64 port > is still not ready to display, but before Rusty makes too many changes > I would like this in upstream so I don't have to keep repeating my > changes :-) > > > So this patch series moves lguest32 out of the way for other archs. Yeah, after some more thought I've not applied most of this. We really don't want to move everything then move it back; I prefer Jes' more cautious approach of moving a little bit at a time. We really have three parts: (1) bits that are generic, (2) bits that should be generic but my implementation is naive, (3) bits that really are i386-specific. Patches which move 2 to 1 are gratefully accepted: I realize a mass move is easier and this requires thought, but that's what we need. Since I can't build a module over two directories, that seems to destroy the idea of an i386/ subdir. Instead I've done a patch which renames the *clearly* i386-specific things to i386_<name>, which at least works. I've pushed it into the repository http://lguest.ozlabs.org/patches/ Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
