Zachary Amsden wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
We haven't seen any issue with the 2.6.22 boot decompressor. Which
of the four (fs, gs, ldt, or tr) were proving problematic and why?
It was tr that was affecting Workstation, since we boot through normal
BIOS path, and only a 16-bit task was loaded at this point.
Ah. Maybe we didn't have an exit while we were in long mode with the
16-bit tss, so VT didn't notice the illegal combination.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
