On 8/8/07, Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, unless I'm very wrong, it only makes sense to talk about not > > supporting large pages in the guest level. But it is not a > > paravirt_ops problem. > > Some MMU-related PV techiniques (including Xen, and direct paging mode > for Xen/KVM) need to write-protect page tables, avoiding to use 2MB > pages when mapping page tables. Looks like you did not, and that > exaplains why the patches are missing the relevant (many) paravirt_ops > in include/asm-x86_64/pgalloc.h, for example, compared with the i386 > tree. I see. I'll address this in the next version of the patch. -- Glauber de Oliveira Costa. "Free as in Freedom" http://glommer.net "The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act." _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
