On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 17:02 +0200, Matias Zabaljauregui wrote: > Rusty, > > You were right, it was the kernel configuration. Hi Matias, Any chance you could tell me what configuration option broke lguest? I should either fix it or document it... > Changing the subject, in the next month I will be studying the > possibilities of implementing the idea behind xenoprof, for lguest. > Do you think this can be useful ? > Any advice? One purpose of lguest is to demonstrate how virtualization should work, so including profiling support is useful. But the other purpose of lguest is to be simple, so it depends how simple the patch to lguest is... (Note that lguest doesn't support NMIs, but Steven has code for NMI support for lguest-x86-64 which could be ported across). Cheers! Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
