Re: [PATCH 0/5] KVM paravirt_ops implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Anthony Liguori wrote:
I've been thinking about this wrt the hypercall page in KVM. The problem is that in a model like KVM (or presumably VMI), migration gets really difficult if you have anything but a trivial hypercall page since the hypercall page will change after migration.

If you cannot guarantee the guest isn't executing code within the hypercall page (or in your case, doing something with paravirt_ops), then you cannot safely migrate.

Hm, you need to quiesce the kernel in some way when you do a migrate, so making sure it isn't in a hypercall would be just part of that. In general you'd make sure all but one CPU is parked somewhere, and the remaining CPU is doing the suspend, right?

The tricky part for Xen in all this is how to make sure all mfn references are visible to the hypervisor/toolstack so they can be remapped; hypercall page contents are not a concern by comparison.

   J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux