Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 4/5] KVM: Add hypercall queue for paravirt_ops implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 08:19 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 15:50 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> These numbers are pretty bad.  I'd like to improve them, even without PV.
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > There's a 20% speedup just waiting to be checked in in the lapic
> > branch ;)
> >
> > (This gain was observed using "make mrproper; make defconfig; time make"
> > on Intel with a non-PV 2.6.21 guest when the lapic code was enabled).
> >   
> 
> So what was the final number you were seeing?  Were you seeing only 25% 
> below native to start with?

If memory serves me correctly, I was getting 9m30s pre-patch, and 7m55s
post-patch.  This translates (I believe) to approximately 19.5%
improvement.  I didn't measure against native.  


-Greg

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux