Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] Virtio draft III: example block driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rusty Russell wrote:
On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 17:25 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
+	/* Set up for reply. */
+	vblk->sg[0].page = virt_to_page(&vbr->in_hdr);
+	vblk->sg[0].offset = offset_in_page(&vbr->in_hdr);
+	vblk->sg[0].length = sizeof(vbr->in_hdr);
+	num = blk_rq_map_sg(q, vbr->req, vblk->sg+1);
+	vbr->out_hdr.id = vblk->vdev->ops->add_inbuf(vblk->vdev, vblk->sg,
+						     1+num, vbr);
+	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(vbr->out_hdr.id))
+		goto full;
+
+	vblk->sg[0].page = virt_to_page(&vbr->out_hdr);
+	vblk->sg[0].offset = offset_in_page(&vbr->out_hdr);
+	vblk->sg[0].length = sizeof(vbr->out_hdr);
+
+	vbr->out_id = vblk->vdev->ops->add_outbuf(vblk->vdev, vblk->sg, 1,
+						  vbr);
This strikes me as wasteful. Why not set up a single descriptor which contains both placement and the data itself?

We could actually do this for write, but not for read (where the length
& sector need to be sent to other end, and the data comes from other
end).


So you map the first sg entry for output, and the rest for input.

Less pretty, but more efficient.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux