Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/3] Virtio draft III

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rusty Russell wrote:
In this episode, Rusty tries to NAPI-ize the driver and discovers that
virtio callbacks are a bad idea: NAPI needs to turn interrupts off and
still be able to query for new incoming packets.

Changes to core:
1) Back to "interrupt" model with get_inbuf()/get_outbuf() calls.

Seems to be these are just two different ways of iterating over the pending buffers, and one could be implemented in terms of the other in a few lines. I think that new new way is better, though, due to less indirection.

btw, I'm not sure that the name 'virtio' is correct. Probably any network or block driver which has support for batching (the vast majority) could use this to good effect.


--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux