Re: [Xen-devel] Re: More virtio users

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  Hi,

Framebuffer is an interesting one.  Virtio doesn't assume shared memory,
so naively the fb you would just send outbufs describing changed memory.
This would work, but describing rectangles is better.  A helper might be
the right approach here

Rectangles work just fine for a framebuffer console. They stop working once you plan to run any graphical stuff such as an X-Server on top of the framebuffer. Only way to get notified about changes is page faults, i.e. 4k granularity on the linear framebuffer memory.

Related to Framebuffer is virtual keyboard and virtual mouse (or better touchscreen), which probably works perfectly fine with virtio. I'd guess you can even reuse the input layer event struct for the virtio events.

Xen has virtual framebuffer, kbd & mouse, although not (yet?) in the paravirt_ops patch queue, so there is something you can look at ;)

cheers,
  Gerd

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux