H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Pardon me for saying it, but it's hardly a hardship to add support for a
> single additional constant in existing code. I'm starting to think this
> argument is approaching not just the silly, but downright ridiculous.
>
Well, if the existing code is a standard libelf/libbfd, it could be tricky.
> Another option is to have the ELF header at a nonzero offset.
>
Yes, that's exactly what I'm proposing.
J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
