Chris Wright wrote:
> This is definitely ad-hoc semantic change, but I don't see a beter
> way to do it (other than have iret be restore_regs_and_iret, which
> isn't really an improvement).
I just realized its a bit nastier than that. There's also the issue of
removing the error_code from the stack, which is above %fs. So it
becomes "restore %fs, remove error_code and iret".
Also, the INTERRUPT_RETURN in nmi_espfix_stack needs us to actually push
%fs and an error code, just so that it can be removed (but I have no
idea whether this is actually correct; it's very much Zach territory).
J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
