Re: lguest re-review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:24:08 +1000
Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 02:51 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Some concern was expressed over the lguest review status, so I shall send
> > the patches out again for people to review, to test, to make observations
> > about the author's personal appearance, etc.
> 
> Thanks Andrew,
> 
> 	This means I can finally ack this patch (thanks Eric):
> 
> From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "[PATCH] paravirt: Add startup infrastructure for paravirtualization"
> 
> This reverts commit c9ccf30d77f04064fe5436027ab9d2230c7cdd94.

I don't get it.  Does lguest no longer need this code, or will
it be reintroduced with an lguest merge, or something else?
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux