On Wed, May 09 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > On Wed, 9 May 2007, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Lets do it after it is merged, as not to create a hold-up point for > > lguest. Once it's in, I'll fix it up. > > Ok. Seems pointless, though, as it's only a matter of: Yes I'm very well aware of that, my point is just that I'll do it once lguest is merged since then a) it has a user, and b) I don't want lguest to wait for me to get that update pulled Can we please let this rest? -- Jens Axboe _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
