Re: [patches] [PATCH] [21/22] x86_64: Extend bzImage protocol for relocatable bzImage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> yhlu wrote:
>> On 5/8/07, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Since the whole point is to detect the case where we don't have
>>> a screen at all it makes sense to check several additional variables
>>> and make certain that they are all 0.  Agreed?
>> need one good way to find if there is support vga console.
> 
> There really isn't one, at least not given the current data structure;
> the data structure has an "isVGA" flag, but if that is 0 it's supposed
> to mean CGA/MDA/HGC/EGA, as opposed to VGA...

Of course, one could argue that since all of those were obsolete by the
time Linux was first created, that it probably doesn't matter and that
isVGA == 0 pretty much means the more obvious thing.

MDA/HGC stuck around for quite a while for debugging, since it was
non-conflicting with VGA, but even if it is, the reason people put it in
their system is to have something that the OS doesn't readily see.

	-hpa
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux