James Bottomley wrote:
> The original one you sent had duplicate smp_call_function...
> definitions. The interdiff between the one you've attached now and the
> one I sent is pretty tiny:
>
Huh. Must have been a mixup somewhere, because this was one was more or
less identical to the last one. Maybe I'd sent out an earlier borken
one you picked up? Anyway, doesn't matter.
> + u32 mask = cpus_addr(cpumask)[0];
>
Ah, didn't know about that.
J
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
